<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style id="owaParaStyle" type="text/css">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}</style>
</head>
<body ocsi="0" fpstyle="1" style="word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(0,0,0); font-size:14px; font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">+1 for Kennan.<br>
<div><br>
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px"><font color="000000"><b><font face="Arial" size="2"></font></b></font>
<div>
<div><font color="000000" face="Arial" size="2">Thanks & Regards<br>
Madhuri Kumari<br>
</font><font color="000000"><b><font face="Arial" size="2"><br>
</font></b></font></div>
</div>
<font color="000000"><b><font face="Arial" size="2"></font></b></font></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div style="direction: ltr;" id="divRpF852456"><font color="#000000" face="Tahoma" size="2"><b>From:</b> Steven Dake (stdake) [stdake@cisco.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, May 31, 2015 11:26 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposing Kai Qiang Wu (Kennan) for Core for Magnum<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>Hi core team,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kennan (Kai Qiang Wu’s nickname) has really done a nice job in Magnum contributions. I would like to propose Kennan for the core reviewer team. I don’t think we necessarily need more core reviewers on Magnum, but Kennan has demonstrated a big commitment
to Magnum and is a welcome addition in my opinion.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For the lifetime of the project, Kennan has contributed 8% of the reviews, and 8% of the commits. Kennan is also active in IRC. He meets my definition of what a core developer for Magnum should be.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Consider my proposal to be a +1 vote.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please vote +1 to approve or vote –1 to veto. A single –1 vote acts as a veto, meaning Kennan would not be approved for the core team. I believe we require 3 +1 core votes presently, but since our core team is larger now then when we started, I’d like
to propose at our next team meeting we formally define the process by which we accept new cores post this proposal for Magnum into the magnum-core group and document it in our wiki.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I’ll leave voting open for 1 week until June 6th to permit appropriate time for the core team to vote. If there is a unanimous decision or veto prior to that date, I’ll close voting and make the appropriate changes in gerrit as appropriate.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks</div>
<div>-steve</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<pre>
DISCLAIMER:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended
for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NEC or its
affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the
opinions of NEC or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender
immediately. .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</pre>