<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Matt Riedemann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mriedem@linux.vnet.ibm.com" target="_blank">mriedem@linux.vnet.ibm.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<br>
On 2/5/2015 4:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 02/05/2015 11:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor<br>
support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete<br>
[...]<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
In that case, I suggest to remove it's contents and just leave a pointer<br>
to the new location,<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
See my point about it being the only place with info about the out of<br>
tree Docker & PowerKVM drivers. I want to give them time to setup a<br>
support matrix in their own GIT repo before removing the only source<br>
of info about them.<br>
<br>
I will be updating the wiki page to warn people about the new location<br>
though.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
There might be some confusion on PowerKVM here, the pKVM support is in tree in the libvirt driver, that's what the PowerKVM third party CI is running against.<br>
<br>
The new as of last week PowerVM driver in stackforge [1] (and older PowerVC driver in stackforge [2]) are different and shouldn't be in the hypervisor support matrix wiki or the in-tree hypervisor support table.<br>
<br>
I can't wait for the day when there will be one power driver to rule them all and Frodo will have to destroy it in Mount Doom to avoid confusion.<br>
<br>
The only thing I'd say about the pKVM support in the in-tree matrix is what it's distro support is, i.e. if I have latest Fedora ppc64 will nova libvirt/qemu work with it? How about Ubuntu?<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/nova-powervm/" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/<u></u>stackforge/nova-powervm/</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/powervc-driver/" target="_blank">http://git.openstack.org/cgit/<u></u>stackforge/powervc-driver/</a><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Matt Riedemann</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)"> </span><br></div></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
______________________________<u></u>______________________________<u></u>______________<br>
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)<br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev-request@lists.<u></u>openstack.org?subject:<u></u>unsubscribe</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Thanks Matt, I'll include that in the patch.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div>