<br><br>On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Deepak Shetty <<a href="mailto:dpkshetty@gmail.com">dpkshetty@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>I think you completely mis-understood my Q<br>I am completely in agreement for _not_ putting CI status in mailing list.<br><br></div><div>Let me rephrase:<br></div><div><br></div>As of now, I see 2 places where CI status is being tracked:<br><br><a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems</a> (clicking on the Link tells u the status)<br>and<br><a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status</a> (one of column is status column)<br><br></div>How are the 2 different ? Do we need to update both ?<br><br>thanx,<br>deepak<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Anita Kuno <span dir="ltr"><<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','anteaya@anteaya.info');" target="_blank">anteaya@anteaya.info</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>On 12/12/2014 03:28 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Anita Kuno <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','anteaya@anteaya.info');" target="_blank">anteaya@anteaya.info</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On 12/11/2014 09:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:<br>
>>> Heya, quick Ceph CI status update. Once the test_volume_boot_pattern<br>
>>> was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing. I have<br>
>>> submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an all green<br>
>>> ceph ci run [2]. So at the moment, and with my revert patch, we're in<br>
>>> good shape.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I will fix up that patch today so that it can be properly reviewed and<br>
>>> hopefully merged. From there I'll submit a patch to infra to move the<br>
>>> job to the check queue as non-voting, and we can go from there.<br>
>>><br>
>>> [1] <a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/</a><br>
>>> [2]<br>
>> <a href="http://logs.openstack.org/93/139693/1/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/12397fd/console.html" target="_blank">http://logs.openstack.org/93/139693/1/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/12397fd/console.html</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> Cheers,<br>
>>><br>
>> Please add the name of your CI account to this table:<br>
>> <a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems</a><br>
>><br>
>> As outlined in the third party CI requirements:<br>
>> <a href="http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements" target="_blank">http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements</a><br>
>><br>
>> Please post system status updates to your individual CI wikipage that is<br>
>> linked to this table.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> How is posting status there different than here :<br>
> <a href="https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status</a><br>
><br>
> thanx,<br>
> deepak<br>
></div><div><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div>Deepak,</div><div><br></div><div>We have been using the Cinder wiki page to track development of each CI and to communicate issues within the Cinder community. The general wiki is for tracking the state of all the different CI systems.</div><div><br></div><div>So, I would say that both should be updated right now, eventually the Cinder one should be deprecated.</div><div><br></div><div>Jay </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div></div><span>> _______________________________________________<br>
> OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org');" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
><br>
</span>There are over 100 CI accounts now and growing.<br>
<br>
Searching the email archives to evaluate the status of a CI is not<br>
something that infra will do, we will look on that wikipage or we will<br>
check the third-party-announce email list (which all third party CI<br>
systems should be subscribed to, as outlined in the third_party.html<br>
page lined above).<br>
<br>
If we do not find information where we have asked you to put it and were<br>
we expect it, we may disable your system until you have fulfilled the<br>
requirements as outlined in the third_party.html page linked above.<br>
<br>
Sprinkling status updates amongst the emails posted to -dev and<br>
expecting the infra team and other -devs to find them when needed is<br>
unsustainable and has been for some time, which is why we came up with<br>
the wikipage to aggregate them.<br>
<br>
Please direct all further questions about this matter to one of the two<br>
third-party meetings as linked above.<br>
<div><div><br>
Thank you,<br>
Anita.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org');" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote><br><br>-- <br><a href="mailto:jsbryant@electronicjungle.net" target="_blank">jsbryant@electronicjungle.net</a><br>