<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 30/10/2014 11:22, Angus Salkeld
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAA16xcx+BueCLK-GjD7_JS0FoqZN54fuC+D+nVdiNuZ5_VXsBw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:48 PM,
            Eoghan Glynn <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:eglynn@redhat.com" target="_blank">eglynn@redhat.com</a>></span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
                class=""><br>
                > > > IIRC, there is no method for removing
                foundation members. So there<br>
                > > > are likely a number of people listed who
                have moved on to other<br>
                > > > activities and are no longer involved
                with OpenStack. I'd actually<br>
                > > > be quite interested to see the turnout
                numbers with voters who<br>
                > > > missed the last two elections prior to
                this one filtered out.<br>
                > ><br>
                > > Well, the base electorate for the TC are
                active contributors with<br>
                > > patches landed to official projects within the
                past year, so these<br>
                > > are devs getting their code merged but not
                interested in voting.<br>
                > > This is somewhat different from (though
                potentially related to) the<br>
                > > "dead weight" foundation membership on the
                rolls for board<br>
                > > elections.<br>
                > ><br>
                > > Also, foundation members who have not voted in
                two board elections<br>
                > > are being removed from the membership now,
                from what I understand<br>
                > > (we just needed to get to the point where we
                had two years worth of<br>
                > > board elections in the first place).<br>
                ><br>
                > Thanks, I lost my mind here and confused the board
                with the TC.<br>
                ><br>
                > So then my next question is, of those who did not
                vote, how many are<br>
                > from under-represented companies? A higher
                percentage there might point<br>
                > to disenfranchisement.<br>
                <br>
              </span>Well, that we don't know, because the ballots are
              anonymized.<br>
              <br>
              So we can only make a stab at detecting partisan voting
              patterns, in<br>
              the form a strict preference for candidates from one
              company over all<br>
              others, but we've no way of knowing whether voters from
              those same<br>
              companies actually cast the ballots in question.<br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>I'd love to see a rule that says you can't vote for
              people from your own company.<br>
            </div>
            <div>That would turn things around :-)<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            <div>-A<br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    I think that hell would freeze over before that happens... <br>
    <br>
    Maish<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAA16xcx+BueCLK-GjD7_JS0FoqZN54fuC+D+nVdiNuZ5_VXsBw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div> </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              ... i.e. from these data, the conclusion that the
              preferred pairs of<br>
              candidates were just more popular across-the-board would
              be equally<br>
              valid.<br>
              <br>
              Conversely, we've no way of knowing if the voters employed
              by those<br>
              "under-represented companies" you mention had a higher or
              lower turnout<br>
              than the average.<br>
              <br>
              If there is a concern about balanced representation, then
              the biggest<br>
              single change we could make to address this, IMO, would be
              to contest<br>
              all TC seats at all elections.<br>
              <br>
              Staggered terms optimize for continuity, but by amplifying
              the majority<br>
              voice (if such a thing exists in our case), they tend to
              pessimize for<br>
              balanced representation.<br>
              <br>
              Cheers,<br>
              Eoghan<br>
              <div class="HOEnZb">
                <div class="h5"><br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev"
                    target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Maish Saidel-Keesing
</pre>
  </body>
</html>