<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello All,<br>
<br>
In a nutshell, I've found the current IPMI Ceilometer sensor naming
structure difficult to deal with from a programmatic perspective if
a consumer wants to simply read all the sensors for a given Ironic
Node.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> The current naming scheme
just doesn't seem to provide a simple fast way to get all the
sensors for a given Ironic Node from Ceilometer. <br>
<br>
I detailed what I learned and proposed a potential alternative
naming structure to the Ironic/Ceilometer bugs as<br>
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1377157">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1377157</a><br>
<br>
I am curious as to what the intended use model was for the current
naming scheme?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Jim</span>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
--- Jim Mankovich | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jmank@hp.com">jmank@hp.com</a> (US Mountain Time) ---</pre>
</body>
</html>