<div dir="ltr">Should subsequent patches be reverted as well that depended on the change in question?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Mark McLoughlin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:markmc@redhat.com" target="_blank">markmc@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey<br>
<br>
(Terrible name for a policy, I know)<br>
<br>
>From the version_cap saga here:<br>
<br>
  <a href="https://review.openstack.org/110754" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/110754</a><br>
<br>
I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations<br>
like this.<br>
<br>
Here's my attempt at documenting what I think we're expecting the<br>
procedure to be:<br>
<br>
  <a href="https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-retrospective-veto-revert-policy" target="_blank">https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-retrospective-veto-revert-policy</a><br>
<br>
If it sounds reasonably sane, I can propose its addition to the<br>
"Development policies" doc.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Kevin Benton</div>
</div>