<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Ryan,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>COPS implies a common protocol to communicate with PEPs, which implies the same communication mechanism basically.</div>
<div>So, you are implying that “endpoints” in GBP will use “different” protocol to communicate with “decisions” entities?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It that is the case.. Well it sounds very complex for a simple GBP initial project. Then, the discussion will be in a different level.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Edgar</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Ryan Moats <<a href="mailto:rmoats@us.ibm.com">rmoats@us.ibm.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Reply-To: </span>"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <<a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 2:18 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <<a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Edgar-</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">I can't speak for anyone else, but in my mind at least (and having been involved in the work that led up to 3198),
</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">the members of the groups being discussed here are not PEPs. As 3198 states, being a PEP implies running COPS</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">and I don't see that as necessary for membership in GBP groups.</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Ryan Moats</font><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Edgar Magana <<a href="mailto:edgar.magana@workday.com">edgar.magana@workday.com</a>> wrote on 08/07/2014 04:02:43 PM:<br>
<br>
> From: Edgar Magana <<a href="mailto:edgar.magana@workday.com">edgar.magana@workday.com</a>></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<br>
> <<a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Date: 08/07/2014 04:03 PM</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. </font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered?</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198</a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new <br>
> names instead of using the standard ones.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Edgar</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> From: Ronak Shah <<a href="mailto:ronak.malav.shah@gmail.com">ronak.malav.shah@gmail.com</a>><br>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <<br>
> <a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>><br>
> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 1:17 PM<br>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <<br>
> <a href="mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org">openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>><br>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Hi,<br>
> Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple<br>
> of days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following <br>
> name changes to the resource. <br>
> <br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> policy-point for endpoint<br>
> policy-group for endpointgroup (epg)</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Please reply if you feel that it is not ok with reason and suggestion.<br>
> <br>
> I hope that it wont be another 150 messages thread :)<br>
> <br>
> Ronak_______________________________________________<br>
> OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</font></tt></p>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>