<html><body>
<p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Edgar-</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">I can't speak for anyone else, but in my mind at least (and having been involved in the work that led up to 3198), </font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">the members of the groups being discussed here are not PEPs. As 3198 states, being a PEP implies running COPS</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">and I don't see that as necessary for membership in GBP groups.</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Ryan Moats</font><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Edgar Magana <edgar.magana@workday.com> wrote on 08/07/2014 04:02:43 PM:<br>
<br>
> From: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana@workday.com></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <br>
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Date: 08/07/2014 04:03 PM</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I am sorry that I could not attend the GBP meeting. </font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Is there any reason why the IEFT standard is not considered?</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198</a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I would like to understand the argument why we are creating new <br>
> names instead of using the standard ones.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Edgar</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> From: Ronak Shah <ronak.malav.shah@gmail.com><br>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <<br>
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><br>
> Date: Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 1:17 PM<br>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <<br>
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><br>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Hi,<br>
> Following a very interesting and vocal thread on GBP for last couple<br>
> of days and the GBP meeting today, GBP sub-team proposes following <br>
> name changes to the resource. <br>
> <br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> policy-point for endpoint<br>
> policy-group for endpointgroup (epg)</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> Please reply if you feel that it is not ok with reason and suggestion.<br>
> <br>
> I hope that it wont be another 150 messages thread :)<br>
> <br>
> Ronak_______________________________________________<br>
> OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</font></tt></body></html>