<html><body>
<p><tt><font size="2">Dan Smith <dms@danplanet.com> wrote on 06/27/2014 12:33:48 PM:<br>
> <br>
> > What if 3rd Party CI didn't vote in Gerrit? What if it instead<br>
> > published to some 3rd party test reporting site (a thing that<br>
> > doesn't yet exist). Gerrit has the facility so that we could inject<br>
> > the dashboard content for this in Gerrit in a little table<br>
> > somewhere, but the data would fundamentally live outside of Gerrit.<br>
> > It would also mean that all the aggregate reporting of 3rd Party CI<br>
> > that's being done in custom gerrit scripts, could be integrated<br>
> > directly into such a thing.<br>
> <br>
> If it really does show up right in Gerrit as if it were integrated,<br>
> then that would be fine with me. I think the biggest problem we have<br>
> right now is that a lot of the CI systems are very inconsistent in<br>
> their reporting and we often don't realize when one of them *hasn't*<br>
> voted. If the new thing could fill out the chart based on everything<br>
> we expect to see a vote from, so that it's very clear that one is<br>
> missing, then that's a net win right there.</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">There is a similar old bug for that, with a good suggestion for how it </font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">could possibly be done:</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2"><a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1251758">https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1251758</a></font></tt><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif"><br>
Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)<br>
OpenStack Development Lead - PowerKVM CI<br>
IBM Linux Technology Center<br>
</font><tt><font size="2"><br>
</font></tt></body></html>