<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier new,monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Goirand <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zigo@debian.org" target="_blank">zigo@debian.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 05/02/2014 05:17 AM, Alexandre Viau wrote:<br>
> Hello Everyone!<br>
><br>
> My name is Alexandre Viau from Savoir-Faire Linux.<br>
><br>
> We have submited a Monitoring as a Service blueprint and need feedback.<br>
><br>
> Problem to solve: Ceilometer's purpose is to track and *measure/meter* usage information collected from OpenStack components (originally for billing). While Ceilometer is usefull for the cloud operators and infrastructure metering, it is not a *monitoring* solution for the tenants and their services/applications running in the cloud because it does not allow for service/application-level monitoring and it ignores detailed and precise guest system metrics.<br>
><br>
> Proposed solution: We would like to add Monitoring as a Service to Openstack<br>
><br>
> Just like Rackspace's Cloud monitoring, the new monitoring service - lets call it OpenStackMonitor for now - would let users/tenants keep track of their ressources on the cloud and receive instant notifications when they require attention.<br>
><br>
> This RESTful API would enable users to create multiple monitors with predefined checks, such as PING, CPU usage, HTTPS and SMTP or custom checks performed by a Monitoring Agent on the instance they want to monitor.<br>
><br>
> Predefined checks such as CPU and disk usage could be polled from Ceilometer. Other predefined checks would be performed by the new monitoring service itself. Checks such as PING could be flagged to be performed from multiple sites.<br>
><br>
> Custom checks would be performed by an optional Monitoring Agent. Their results would be polled by the monitoring service and stored in Ceilometer.<br>
><br>
> If you wish to collaborate, feel free to contact me at <a href="mailto:alexandre.viau@savoirfairelinux.com">alexandre.viau@savoirfairelinux.com</a><br>
> The blueprint is available here: <a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+spec/monitoring-as-a-service" target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+spec/monitoring-as-a-service</a><br>
><br>
> Thanks!<br>
<br>
</div></div>I would prefer if monitoring capabilities was added to Ceilometer rather<br>
than adding yet-another project to deal with.<br>
<br>
What's the reason for not adding the feature to Ceilometer directly?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Thomas<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'courier new',monospace">I'd also be interested in the overlap between your proposal and Ceilometer. It seems at first thought that it would be better to introduce the monitoring functionality in to Ceilometer and make that project more diverse as opposed to yet another project.</div>
<br></div></div>