<div dir="ltr">After a read through seems pretty good.<div><br></div><div>+1</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Boris Pavlovic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bpavlovic@mirantis.com" target="_blank">bpavlovic@mirantis.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi stackers, </div><div><br></div><div>As a result of discussion:</div><div>[openstack-dev] [all][db][performance] Proposal: Get rid of soft deletion (step by step) </div>
<div><a href="http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-dev/2014-03/msg00947.html" target="_blank">http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-dev/2014-03/msg00947.html</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div>I understood that there should be another proposal. About how we should implement Restorable & Delayed Deletion of OpenStack Resource in common way & without these hacks with soft deletion in DB.  It is actually very simple, take a look at this document: </div>

<div><br></div><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WGrIgMtWJqPDyT6PkPeZhNpej2Q9Mwimula8S8lYGV4/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WGrIgMtWJqPDyT6PkPeZhNpej2Q9Mwimula8S8lYGV4/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>

<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Boris Pavlovic </div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>