<div dir="ltr">If distributed router is good enough, why do we still need non-distributed router?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Ian Wells <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ijw.ubuntu@cack.org.uk" target="_blank">ijw.ubuntu@cack.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I would imagine that, from the Neutron perspective, you get a single router whether or not it's distributed. I think that if a router is distributed - regardless of whether it's tenant-tenant or tenant-outside - it certainly *could* have some sort of SLA flag, but I don't think a simple 'distributed' flag is either here or there; it's not telling the tenant anything meaningful.<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 10 December 2013 00:48, Mike Wilson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:geekinutah@gmail.com" target="_blank">geekinutah@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I guess the question that immediately comes to mind is, is there anyone that doesn't want a distributed router? I guess there could be someone out there that hates the idea of traffic flowing in a balanced fashion, but can't they just run a single router then? Does there really need to be some flag to disable/enable this behavior? Maybe I am oversimplifying things... you tell me.<div>
<br></div><div>-Mike Wilson</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan@hp.com" target="_blank">swaminathan.vasudevan@hp.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div>
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Folks,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are in the process of defining the API for the Neutron Distributed Virtual Router, and we have a question.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Just wanted to get the feedback from the community before we implement and post for review.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We are planning to use the “distributed” flag for the routers that are supposed to be routing traffic locally (both East West and North South).
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This “distributed” flag is already there in the “neutronclient” API, but currently only utilized by the “Nicira Plugin”.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We would like to go ahead and use the same “distributed” flag and add an extension to the router table to accommodate the “distributed flag”.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please let us know your feedback.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Swaminathan Vasudevan<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Systems Software Engineer (TC)<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">HP Networking<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hewlett-Packard<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">8000 Foothills Blvd<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">M/S 5541<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Roseville, CA - 95747<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">tel: <a href="tel:916.785.0937" value="+19167850937" target="_blank">916.785.0937</a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">fax: <a href="tel:916.785.1815" value="+19167851815" target="_blank">916.785.1815</a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">email: <a href="mailto:swaminathan.vasudevan@hp.com" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue">swaminathan.vasudevan@hp.com</span></a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>