<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body style='font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>On 2013-12-06 03:22, Ladislav Smola wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><br />
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert Collins wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px">
<pre>Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this months review:
- Ghe Rivero for -core
- Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
- Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
- Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
- Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core
- Jamomir Coufal for removal from -core
Existing -core members are eligible to vote - please indicate your
opinion on each of the three changes above in reply to this email.
Ghe, please let me know if you're willing to be in tripleo-core. Jan,
Jordan, Martyn, Jiri & Jaromir, if you are planning on becoming
substantially more active in TripleO reviews in the short term, please
let us know.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hey there,<br /><br /> thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as current non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others, especially when UI was on hold and I was designing future views. I'll continue working on designs much more, but I will also keep an eye on code which is going in. I believe that UX reviews will be needed before merging so that we assure keeping the vision. That's why I would like to express my will to stay within -core even when I don't deliver that big amount of reviews as other engineers. However if anybody feels that I should be just +1, I completely understand and I will give up my +2 power.<br /><br /></blockquote>
<br /> I wonder whether there can be a sort of honorary core title. jcoufal is contributing a lot, but not that much with code or reviews.</blockquote>
<p>What purpose would this serve? The only thing core gives you is the ability to +2 in Gerrit. If you're not reviewing, "core" is meaningless. It's great to contribute to the mailing list, but being core shouldn't have any influence on that one way or another. This is a meritocracy where suggestions are judged based on their value, not whether the suggester has +2 ability (which honorary core wouldn't provide anyway, I assume). At least that's the ideal. I think everyone following the project is aware of Jaromir's contributions and a title isn't going to change that one way or another.</p>
<p>-Ben</p>
<div> </div>
</body></html>