<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/06/2013 05:36 PM, Ben Nemec
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:46c7dfa2d55d537d802e29037d44973e@localhost"
type="cite">
<p>On 2013-12-06 03:22, Ladislav Smola wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;
border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/06/2013 09:56 AM, Jaromir
Coufal wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;
border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013/04/12 08:12, Robert
Collins wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;
border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px">
<pre>Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this months review:
- Ghe Rivero for -core
- Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
- Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
- Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
- Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core
- Jamomir Coufal for removal from -core
Existing -core members are eligible to vote - please indicate your
opinion on each of the three changes above in reply to this email.
Ghe, please let me know if you're willing to be in tripleo-core. Jan,
Jordan, Martyn, Jiri & Jaromir, if you are planning on becoming
substantially more active in TripleO reviews in the short term, please
let us know.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hey there,<br>
<br>
thanks Rob for keeping eye on this. Speaking for myself, as
current non-coder it was very hard to keep pace with others,
especially when UI was on hold and I was designing future
views. I'll continue working on designs much more, but I will
also keep an eye on code which is going in. I believe that UX
reviews will be needed before merging so that we assure
keeping the vision. That's why I would like to express my will
to stay within -core even when I don't deliver that big amount
of reviews as other engineers. However if anybody feels that I
should be just +1, I completely understand and I will give up
my +2 power.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I wonder whether there can be a sort of honorary core title.
jcoufal is contributing a lot, but not that much with code or
reviews.</blockquote>
<p>What purpose would this serve? The only thing core gives you
is the ability to +2 in Gerrit. If you're not reviewing, "core"
is meaningless. It's great to contribute to the mailing list,
but being core shouldn't have any influence on that one way or
another. This is a meritocracy where suggestions are judged
based on their value, not whether the suggester has +2 ability
(which honorary core wouldn't provide anyway, I assume). At
least that's the ideal. I think everyone following the project
is aware of Jaromir's contributions and a title isn't going to
change that one way or another.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Well. It's true. The only thing that comes to my mind is a swell
dinner at summit. :-D<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:46c7dfa2d55d537d802e29037d44973e@localhost"
type="cite">
<p>-Ben</p>
<div> </div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>