<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:06 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) <<a href="mailto:kmestery@cisco.com">kmestery@cisco.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br>We have seen the BP and review. The problem that we Neutron core are currently<br>looking at is something which was discussed at the Summit in Hong Kong last week:<br>The requirement of having Smokestack/Tempest tests for plugins. As a core team, we<br>haven't decided yet if new plugins will require these tests before being added to the<br>tree. <br></div></blockquote><br></div><div><br></div><div>I’ll send out more information later today, but all new Neutron plugin and drivers proposed for inclusion in Icehouse will require testing to be in place prior to acceptance into the tree. Without the proper testing infrastructure in place there is no way for the review team to know if the submitted code works.</div><div><br></div><div>mark</div><div><br></div><br></body></html>