<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#333333">
We moved the whole conversation to new OpenStack UX discussion tool,
feel free to follow the thread there:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/5/tuskar-ui-resource-class-creation/">http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/5/tuskar-ui-resource-class-creation/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013/21/10 20:59, Liz Blanchard
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:70C218D9-2ABC-42D9-B347-5C514BA9145E@redhat.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Hi Jarda,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Below you will find my comments and questions on the latest
version of the Resource Class Creation wireframes.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please let me know if you have any questions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Liz<br>
<div>
<div>On Oct 16, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Jaromir Coufal <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:jcoufal@redhat.com">jcoufal@redhat.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#333333"> Hey folks,<br>
<br>
I am sending an updated version of wireframes for Resource
Class Creation. Thanks everybody for your feedback, I
tried to cover most of your concerns and I am sending
updated version for your reviews. If you have any
concerns, I am happy to discuss it with you.<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://people.redhat.com/%7Ejcoufal/openstack/tuskar/2013-10-16_tuskar_resource_class_creation_wireframes.pdf">http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tuskar/2013-10-16_tuskar_resource_class_creation_wireframes.pdf</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><!--?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?-->
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">1) Will the user be able
to click on any of the wizard steps in the menu at the
top?
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">2) There shouldn't be a
"Back" button on the first step of the wizard. The user
will never have an opportunity to go back from here.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">3) First class should be
selected by default. Especially if the field that changes
below is just the description.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">4) Rather than labeling
the class description with the class name, it should be
"Class Description:".
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">5) The "Assist" checkbox
labeling is confusing. Perhaps "Assist with proper halving
of resources" would be better?
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">6) If the user unselects
the "Assist" checkbox, it would be great if that section
could collapse to save space. Alternatively, it would
reappear if the user selects the checkbox again.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">7) How come the user can't
click the back button from the 2nd page? It looks greyed
out like the "Hardware Profile" button.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">8) I think we need a
clearer design for when a table is empty. Maybe even a
small message within the table along the lines of "There
are currently no items."
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">9) Rather than "Yes" and
"No" in the confirmation dialog, I think it would make it
more clear to the user if the action they were taking is
used. For example "Start Over" or "Enable Assistant" would
be more descriptive.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">10) Is the Node Profile
name going to be reflected in the tab name above? If so,
it might be nice to fill in the field for "Profile Name"
to be "Node Profile 1" by default. Then it could change as
the user changes it in the field.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">11) It would be better to
name the "Add Row" link more specifically to the action.
Probably "Add Requirement" in this case.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">12) Is the "Associated
Images" field supposed to be a drop down? Or should there
be a Browse button? I'm just wondering why it has the
helper text "Choose an image".
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">13) Would the image have
an extension associated with it? If so, it might be good
to show different examples here (Ex. QCOW2, ISO, IMG)
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">14) Are you sure we should
select Nodes to assign to this resource class by default?
It would be nice to ask some sample users this type of
thing.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">15) I think we can combine
the label of "4 Matching Available Nodes" and the select
action. This way, it would be clear that the user would be
selecting the 4 matching nodes...
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">16) The filter/search
should be aligned closer to the table that it is
filtering.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">17) Where does the
"L2-default_group" name come from in this list?
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">18) The filter description
should probably be shortened to read "Current Filter:
group 2". Also, I think the number of results might make
sense to be on a different level. This might start to feel
more organized if the search/filter control comes down to
this level so that it's closer to the table.
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; "><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Arial; ">19) If the user unselects
the "Select all available" after filtering, it should
still unselect all 4 matching nodes. In your example
you've shown that only 2 of the 4 are unselected and then
in screen 29 th user is in a weird state where they have
unselected all matching nodes, but the table still shows
that 2 nodes are selected. I think instead, it might make
sense to have a "Select All/Unselected All" action at the
table level. </div>
</div>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#333333"> <br>
Thanks<br>
-- Jarda<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>