<div dir="ltr">Hi Folks,<div><br></div><div>I am also very much curious about this. Earlier this bp had a dependency on query scheduler, which is now merged. It will be very helpful if anyone can throw some light on the fate of this bp.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Syed Armani</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Chris Friesen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chris.friesen@windriver.com" target="_blank">chris.friesen@windriver.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm interested in automatically evacuating instances in the case of a failed compute node.  I found the following blueprint that covers exactly this case:<br>

<br>
<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/evacuate-instance-automatically" target="_blank">https://blueprints.launchpad.<u></u>net/nova/+spec/evacuate-<u></u>instance-automatically</a><br>
<br>
However, the comments there seem to indicate that the code that orchestrates the evacuation shouldn't go into nova (referencing the Havana design summit).<br>
<br>
Why wouldn't this type of behaviour belong in nova?  (Is there a summary of discussions at the summit?)  Is there a recommended place where this sort of thing should go?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Chris<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.<u></u>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>openstack-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>