<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Michael Still <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mikal@stillhq.com" target="_blank">mikal@stillhq.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">[Concerns over review wait times in the nova project]<br>
<br>
I think that we're also seeing the fact that nova-core's are also<br>
developers. nova-core members have the same feature freeze deadline,<br>
and that means that to a certain extent we need to stop reviewing in<br>
order to get our own code ready by the deadline.<br>
<br>
The strength of nova-core is that its members are active developers,<br>
so I think a "reviewer caste" would be a mistake.</blockquote><div><br>+1<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> So, I think lower review rates around deadlines are just a fact of life.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, and really encouraging people to submit their patches as early in the cycle as possible.<br></div><div>It will be interesting to look at the stats afterwards to see if the feature proposal deadline <br>
two weeks ahead of the freeze has helped. If so, perhaps it should be brought even further back.<br></div><div> <br></div><div>Chris<br></div></div></div></div>