<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Mark McLoughlin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:markmc@redhat.com" target="_blank">markmc@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 18:02 -0300, Thierry Carrez wrote:<br>
> Simo Sorce wrote:<br>
> > On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 14:06 -0300, Thierry Carrez wrote:<br>
> >> I explained why I prefer it to land in a few weeks rather than now...<br>
> >> Can someone explain why they prefer the reverse ? Why does it have to be<br>
> >> in havana ?<br>
> ><br>
> > Because it was painful top rebase due to the migrations code, however<br>
> > since Adam landed the code that splits migrations so that extensions can<br>
> > have their own separate code for that I think the burden will be<br>
> > substantially lower.<br>
> ><br>
> > If this is your final word on the matter I'll take notice that the work<br>
> > will be deferred till Icehouse and I will slightly demote its priority<br>
> > in my work queue.<br>
><br>
> Like I said in the other email, I don't really have "the final word" on<br>
> this, Dolph has. I can only influence his decision. Personally, with the<br>
> information I have so far, I think the benefits of waiting outweigh the<br>
> drawbacks, but that may be just me and my fear of repeating past mistakes.<br>
<br>
</div>During the Oslo meeting last Friday, we decided it would be best to<br>
defer the secure messaging feature until Icehouse. While the code seems<br>
pretty complete, it'll naturally need some settling in time, time to<br>
make all the projects use it and then stuff like docs, devstack support,<br>
etc.<br>
<br>
I'm looking forward to see this land early in Icehouse.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Given the above (with no consumers in havana), security backports to havana would be a completely unnecessary overhead that I'm more than happy to avoid. I've retargeted the bp at "next" until we have an icehouse-m1 milestone to use.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I'd like to keep the implementation in active review though, and aim to merge it as soon as we're open for icehouse development.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Part of the implications of this is that we'll focus efforts on adding<br>
this feature to oslo.messaging in Icehouse rather than the rpc library<br>
in oslo-incubator.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Mark.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><br></div>-Dolph
</div></div>