<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sean Dague <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sean@dague.net" target="_blank">sean@dague.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ok, sweet. :) I figured it was worth an email thread anyway, as that gives people a heads up that it's coming.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Defiantly</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
-Sean<div class="im"><br>
<br>
On 06/12/2013 12:51 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
After talking to James Blair on IRC yesterday, I enabled H102 in the<br>
second patchset<br>
(<a href="https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32461/1..2/setup.cfg" target="_blank">https://review.openstack.org/<u></u>#/c/32461/1..2/setup.cfg</a>) but forgot to<br>
update the commit message. I have just fixed that in the third<br>
patchset. Part of my original hesitation was in order to get more<br>
feedback, as I don't want to dictate requirements but rather provide a<br>
way to enforce the consensus.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Mark McLoughlin <<a href="mailto:markmc@redhat.com" target="_blank">markmc@redhat.com</a><br></div><div class="im">
<mailto:<a href="mailto:markmc@redhat.com" target="_blank">markmc@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 07:52 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:<br>
> The current debate is whether or not this is defined policy. My<br>
feeling<br>
> was the results of the TC discussion meant that this was defined<br>
policy.<br>
> 95%+ of code files currently do this, it ensures that there is no<br>
> ambiguity on the fact that these files are under this license.<br>
Various<br>
> interpretations of copyright might say they are not required, but<br>
as we<br>
> have, by convention, already basically implemented this policy,<br>
I'd like<br>
> to just finish the enforcement in hacking so it's yet another<br>
thing we<br>
> don't need to manually review for.<br>
<br>
Agree, it's pretty clearly our de-facto policy that we include a license<br>
header in python files.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Mark.<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.<u></u>org</a><br></div>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.<u></u>openstack.org</a>><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>openstack-dev</a><div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org" target="_blank">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.<u></u>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/<u></u>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/<u></u>openstack-dev</a><br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
<br><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
-- <br>
Sean Dague<br>
<a href="http://dague.net" target="_blank">http://dague.net</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>