<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jay Pipes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jaypipes@gmail.com" target="_blank">jaypipes@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 05/22/2013 03:25 PM, John Wood wrote:<br>
> There appears to be a movement away from having tenant IDs embedded in the URIs of OpenStack services, so we are curious if a new project such as Barbican should omit the tenant ID altogether, utilizing the tenant information in the Keystone token instead.<br>

><br>
> Please weigh in if you can.<br>
<br>
</div>Yes, please avoid using the tenant ID in the URI structure.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-jay<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org">OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>