<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>I definitely agree with point (1) from Yi below. There are so many flavors and intricacies to VPNs that it would be to our advantage to decouple as much as possible.<br><br>For (2), my understanding is that the quantum VPN could be either. Is your comment to add this explicit role in addition to the state fields?<br><br>Sachin<br><br><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Yi Yang" <yyos1999@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:42:35 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] Quantum VPN: Update from today's discussion<br><br>A couple of quick comments:<br><br>1. IMHO, we should separate IPSec/SSL VPN use cases from MPLS VPN cases, <br>as the former adopts a server-client model while the latter doesn't.<br><br>2. One thing missed in these use cases, except in use case 3, is the <br>"role" -- does the quantum VPN act as a server or a client?<br><br>Yi<br><br><br><br>On 4/16/13 8:16 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:<br>> Hi folks<br>><br>> Thank you for joining today's discussion.<br>> Based on today's discussion, we updated the slide.<br>><br>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LdL0Fy9PpEQXB9q_c47iJ6gyA1oZn7B6MKbzFyk73tI/edit#slide=id.gd23898b7_135<br>><br>> Changes<br>> - Simplify use case<br>> removed any router references because it deals with implementation<br>> - Simplify Generic VPNService model<br>> removed any router references because it deals with service insertion<br>> - Update attributes of generic VPN Service<br>> Layer2 or Layer3 mode etc<br>><br>> Tommorows' discussion is<br>> 5:20 at OpenStack Networking room<br>> http://openstacksummitapril2013.sched.org/event/a9264b0dd9470fba9335acc8a78ff61c#.UW3p1SvC82g<br>><br>> Thanks!<br>> Nachi<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<br>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>OpenStack-dev mailing list<br>OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<br>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev<br></div><br></div></body></html>