<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Sean Dague <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sdague@linux.vnet.ibm.com" target="_blank">sdague@linux.vnet.ibm.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 07/15/2012 11:46 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 07/14/2012 06:05 AM, Yun Mao wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
perhaps the pep8 check should ignore the openstack-common code. Thanks,<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes. We actually did this in one of the other projects and I think it's<br>
a good idea.<br>
<br>
pep8 checking for openstack-common should happen in openstack-common.<br>
It's a library - we're just not installing it that way just this moment. :)<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
There has been an aweful lot of pep8 churn during Folsom, which I'm not sure wins us a lot. It seems like it would be more sensible to pick a pep8 version at Design Summit, and have all OpenStack projects that are looking to be part of Grizzly just fix that for the release.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div>Doug</div><div><br></div></div>