Open Stack

On 09/04/2018 09:37 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-09-04 09:32:20 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote:
> [...]
>> it allowed for the possibility that there could be another project
>> which provided the same service-type. That hasn't really come to
>> pass
> [...]
> 
> It still might make sense to attempt to look at this issue from
> outside the limited scope of the OpenStack community. Is the
> expectation that the project when packaged (on PyPI, in Linux
> distributions and so on) will just be referred to as "placement"
> with no further context?

I don't see any reason why the package name needs to be identical to the 
repo name.

Is there a reason we couldn't have openstack-placement be the package name?

Best,
-jay