[openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [all] Naming the T release of OpenStack

Remo Mattei remo at rm.ht
Thu Oct 18 17:08:12 UTC 2018


Michal, that will never work it’s 11 characters long


 

> On Oct 18, 2018, at 09:43, Eric Fried <openstack at fried.cc> wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I'm opposed to this idea.
> 
> I admit I don't understand the political framework, nor have I read the
> governing documents beyond [1], but that document makes it clear that
> this is supposed to be a community-wide vote.  Is it really legal for
> the TC (or whoever has merge rights on [2]) to merge a patch that gives
> that same body the power to take the decision out of the hands of the
> community? So it's really an oligarchy that gives its constituency the
> illusion of democracy until something comes up that it feels like not
> having a vote on? The fact that it's something relatively "unimportant"
> (this time) is not a comfort.
> 
> Not that I think the TC would necessarily move forward with [2] in the
> face of substantial opposition from non-TC "cores" or whatever.
> 
> I will vote enthusiastically for "Train". But a vote it should be.
> 
> -efried
> 
> [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html <https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/release-naming.html>
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611511/ <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611511/>
> 
> On 10/18/2018 10:52 AM, Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
>> +1 for the poll.
>> 
>> Let’s follow well established process.
>> 
>> If we want to add Train as one of the options for the name I am OK with it.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> *From:* Jonathan Mills <jonmills at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2018 10:49 AM
>> *To:* openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-sigs] [all] Naming the T release of OpenStack
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>> Please report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for
>> sensitive information.
>> 
>> +1 for just having a poll
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:39 AM David Medberry <openstack at medberry.net
>> <mailto:openstack at medberry.net <mailto:openstack at medberry.net>>> wrote:
>> 
>>    I'm fine with Train but I'm also fine with just adding it to the
>>    list and voting on it. It will win.
>> 
>>     
>> 
>>    Also, for those not familiar with the debian/ubuntu command "sl",
>>    now is the time to become so.
>> 
>>     
>> 
>>    apt install sl
>> 
>>    sl -Flea #ftw
>> 
>>     
>> 
>>    On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:35 AM Tony Breeds
>>    <tony at bakeyournoodle.com <mailto:tony at bakeyournoodle.com> <mailto:tony at bakeyournoodle.com <mailto:tony at bakeyournoodle.com>>> wrote:
>> 
>>        Hello all,
>>            As per [1] the nomination period for names for the T release
>>        have
>>        now closed (actually 3 days ago sorry).  The nominated names and any
>>        qualifying remarks can be seen at2].
>> 
>>        Proposed Names
>>         * Tarryall
>>         * Teakettle
>>         * Teller
>>         * Telluride
>>         * Thomas
>>         * Thornton
>>         * Tiger
>>         * Tincup
>>         * Timnath
>>         * Timber
>>         * Tiny Town
>>         * Torreys
>>         * Trail
>>         * Trinidad
>>         * Treasure
>>         * Troublesome
>>         * Trussville
>>         * Turret
>>         * Tyrone
>> 
>>        Proposed Names that do not meet the criteria
>>         * Train
>> 
>>        However I'd like to suggest we skip the CIVS poll and select
>>        'Train' as
>>        the release name by TC resolution[3].  My think for this is
>> 
>>         * It's fun and celebrates a humorous moment in our community
>>         * As a developer I've heard the T release called Train for quite
>>           sometime, and was used often at the PTG[4].
>>         * As the *next* PTG is also in Colorado we can still choose a
>>           geographic based name for U[5]
>>         * If train causes a problem for trademark reasons then we can
>>        always
>>           run the poll
>> 
>>        I'll leave[3] for marked -W for a week for discussion to happen
>>        before the
>>        TC can consider / vote on it.
>> 
>>        Yours Tony.
>> 
>>        [1]
>>        http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/134995.html
>>        [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/T_Proposals
>>        [3]
>>        https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I0d8d3f24af0ee8578712878a3d6617aad1e55e53
>>        [4] https://twitter.com/vkmc/status/1040321043959754752
>>        [5]
>>        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T–Z <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T%E2%80%93Z>
>>        <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T%E2%80%93Z <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Colorado:_T%E2%80%93Z>>
>>        _______________________________________________
>>        openstack-sigs mailing list
>>        openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>>        <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>>
>>        http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
>> 
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    openstack-sigs mailing list
>>    openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>>    <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>>
>>    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> openstack-sigs mailing list
>> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openstack-sigs mailing list
> openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-sigs at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20181018/eb3aca3d/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list