Open Stack

On 05/23/2018 02:00 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-05-22 17:41:18 -0400 (-0400), Brian Haley wrote:
> [...]
>> I read this the other way - the goal is to get all the forked code from
>> StarlingX into upstream repos.  That seems backwards from how this should
>> have been done (i.e. upstream first), and I don't see how a project would
>> prioritize that over other work.
> [...]
> 
> I have yet to see anyone suggest it should be prioritized over other
> work. I expect the extracted and proposed changes/specs
> corresponding to the divergence would be viewed on their own merits
> just like any other change and ignored, reviewed, rejected, et
> cetera as appropriate.

Even doing that is work - going through changes, finding nuggets, 
proposing new specs.... I don't think we can expect a project to even go 
there, it has to be driven by someone already involved in StarlingX, IMHO.

-Brian