[openstack-dev] [StarlingX] StarlingX code followup discussions

Jeremy Stanley fungi at yuggoth.org
Wed May 23 18:00:26 UTC 2018

On 2018-05-22 17:41:18 -0400 (-0400), Brian Haley wrote:
> I read this the other way - the goal is to get all the forked code from
> StarlingX into upstream repos.  That seems backwards from how this should
> have been done (i.e. upstream first), and I don't see how a project would
> prioritize that over other work.

I have yet to see anyone suggest it should be prioritized over other
work. I expect the extracted and proposed changes/specs
corresponding to the divergence would be viewed on their own merits
just like any other change and ignored, reviewed, rejected, et
cetera as appropriate.
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180523/b60c13f2/attachment.sig>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list