Open Stack

On 2018-05-17 18:47:06 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 5/17/2018 5:23 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > Not to troll too hard here, but it's kind of frustrating to see that
> > twitter trumps people actually proposing sessions on time and then
> > having them be rejected.
> 
> I reckon this is because there were already a pre-defined set of slots /
> rooms for Forum sessions and we had fewer sessions proposed than reserved
> slots, and that's why adding something in later is not a major issue?

Yes, as I understand it we still have some overflow space too if
planned forum sessions need continuing. Session leaders have
hopefully received details from the event planners on how to reserve
additional space in such situations. As far as I'm aware no proposed
Forum sessions were rejected this time around, and there was some
discussion among members of the TC (in #openstack-tc[*]) before it
was agreed there was room to squeeze this particular latecomer into
the lineup.

[*] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-05-14.log.html#t2018-05-14T17:27:05
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180518/d4f36e93/attachment.sig>