Open Stack

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
wrote:

> Both of those are good ideas.
>

Agree. I like the socket idea a bit more as I can imagine some operators
don't want config file changes automatically applied. Do we want to choose
one to standardize on or allow each project (or operators, via config) the
choice?

I believe adding those things to oslo.service would make them available to
> all applications.
>

Not necessarily - this discussion started when the Keystone team was
discussing how to implement this, given that keystone doesn't use
oslo.service. That said, it should be easy to implement in services that
don't want this dependency, so +1.

// jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180319/7bbb2f41/attachment.html>