[openstack-dev] [heat][tacker][heat-translator] deliverables of heat-translator library

HADDLETON, Robert W (Bob) bob.haddleton at nokia.com
Wed Jun 20 16:38:17 UTC 2018

The Tacker team is dependent on tosca-parser and heat-translator but 
they are not the only consumers.

I agree the structure is odd, and Sahdev has more of the history than I do.

In the past the requests from the Tacker team have come to Sahdev/me and 
we have created
releases as needed.  For some reason this time a request went to the 
Heat ML, in addition to
a separate request to me directly.

I'm open to changes in the structure but I don't think Tacker is the 
right place to put the


On 6/20/2018 11:31 AM, Rico Lin wrote:
> To continue the discussion in 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-June/131681.html
> Add Tacker and heat-translator to make sure all aware this discussion
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:28 AM Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com 
> <mailto:doug at doughellmann.com>> wrote:
>     Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-06-20 12:07:49 -0400:
>     > On 20/06/18 11:40, Rico Lin wrote:
>     > > I send a release patch now
>     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/576895/
>     > > Also, add Bob Haddleton to this ML who is considering as PTL for
>     > > heat-translator team
>     >
>     > Is it time to consider moving the heat-translator and
>     tosca-parser repos
>     > from being deliverables of Heat to deliverables of Tacker? The
>     current
>     > weird structure dates from the days of the experiment with
>     OpenStack
>     > 'Programs' (vs. Projects).
>     >
>     > Heat cores don't really have time to be engaging with
>     heat-translator,
>     > and Tacker is clearly the major user and the thing that keeps
>     getting
>     > blocked on needing patches merged and releases made.
>     It sounds like it. I had no idea there was any reason to look to
>     anyone
>     other than the Heat PTL or liaison for approval of that release. A WIP
>     on the patch would have been OK, too, but if the Tacker team is really
>     the one responsible we should update the repo governance.
>     Doug
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     -- 
>     May The Force of OpenStack Be With You,
>     */Rico Lin
>     /*irc: ricolin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180620/bcd7e871/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bob_haddleton.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180620/bcd7e871/attachment.vcf>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list