[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-26
jaypipes at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 17:06:02 UTC 2018
On 07/02/2018 03:31 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 28/06/18 15:09, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>> * made the barrier to testing/development as low as 'curl
>> http://......minikube; minikube start' (this spurs adoption and
> That's not so different from devstack though.
>> * not having large silo's in deployment projects allowed better
>> communication on common tooling.
>> * Operator focused architecture, not project based architecture.
>> This simplifies the deployment situation greatly.
>> * try whenever possible to focus on just the commons and push vendor
>> specific needs to plugins so vendors can deal with vendor issues
>> directly and not corrupt the core.
> I agree with all of those, but to be fair to OpenStack, you're leaving
> out arguably the most important one:
> * Installation instructions start with "assume a working datacenter"
> They have that luxury; we do not. (To be clear, they are 100% right to
> take full advantage of that luxury. Although if there are still folks
> who go around saying that it's a trivial problem and OpenStackers must
> all be idiots for making it look so difficult, they should really stop
> embarrassing themselves.)
There is nothing trivial about the creation of a working datacenter --
never mind a *well-running* datacenter. Comparing Kubernetes to
OpenStack -- particular OpenStack's lower levels -- is missing this
fundamental point and ends up comparing apples to oranges.
More information about the OpenStack-dev