Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2018-01-26 09:38:18 -0600: > On 1/23/2018 12:40 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > ## OpenStack-wide Goals > > > > There are four proposed [OpenStack-wide > > goals](https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/index.html): > > > > * [Add Cold upgrades > > capabilities](https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533544/) > > * [Add Rocky goal to remove > > mox](https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532361/) > > * [ > > Add Rocky goal to enable mutable > > configuration](https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534605/) > > * [ > > Add Rocky goal to ensure pagination > > links](https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532627/) > > > > These need to be validated by the community, but they are not [getting > > as much > > feedback](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-23.log.html#t2018-01-23T09:16:51) > > > > as hoped. There are different theories as to why, from "people are > > busy", to "people don't feel empowered to comment", to "people don't > > care". Whatever it is, without input the onus falls on the TC to make > > choices, increasing the risk that the goals will be perceived as a > > diktat. As always, we need to work harder to have high fidelity > > feedback loops. This is especially true in our "mature" phase. > > What's the due date on approving the community wide goals for Rocky? > Given the PTG is around the corner (by a month I guess), why not just > have the discussion in person at the PTG (for those attending in person > anyway)? > Ideally we would use the time at the PTG to discuss implementation details. Doug