[openstack-dev] [nova] heads up to users of Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filter: behavior change in >= Ocata

Mathieu Gagné mgagne at calavera.ca
Fri Jan 19 15:35:38 UTC 2018


Hi Chris,

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Chris Friesen
<chris.friesen at windriver.com> wrote:
>
> The existing mechanisms to control aggregate membership will still work, so
> the remaining issue is how to control the allocation ratios.
>
> What about implementing a new HTTP API call (as a local private patch) to
> set the allocation ratios for a given host?  This would only be valid for
> your scenario where a given host is only present in a single aggregate, but
> it would allow your techs to modify the ratios.

While I agree that we can implement something in a private patch, this
is something we are trying very hard to much away from.
If Nova proposes using the placement API for such use cases, I think
it should also provides the same features as the replaced solutions
because people could have relied on those.
And suggesting a configuration management system is enough was
unfortunately a false assumption.
I still have to figure out how a workflow based on placement will be
feasible for us.
But as I said, the lack of granular ACLs is a huge concern for us and
I don't know how it can be addressed in the near future.

--
Mathieu



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list