Open Stack

Hi Dims. Thanks, done.

Hi Tim,

Thanks for the question.
In OpenStack HA community, we discussed about converged upstream
solution for 3 cycles now [1][2]. Adam Spiers and I present our findings and
proposal in Boston summit [3]. Comparison with other F/OSS solutions are
in [4] and, as the HA community we presented our unified architecture.
Our unified solution for compute node failure scenario is in [5],
where Masakari is a key component of the architecture. For other
failure scenarios such as, process failure or instance failure, only
Masakari can
recover instances.  From all the discussions I had with community
members so far,
I  think Masakari is the right solution to address VMs HA.
Or otherwise, anyone is welcome to raise their concerns now.
I will be happy to discuss them.

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-instance-ha
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstack-resource-agents-specs
[3] https://www.openstack.org/videos/boston-2017/high-availability-for-instances-moving-to-a-converged-upstream-solution
[4] https://aspiers.github.io/openstack-summit-2017-boston-compute-ha/#/comparison
[5] https://aspiers.github.io/openstack-summit-2017-boston-compute-ha/#/grand-unified-architecture




--- Regards,
Sampath



On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
> Great to see efforts for this use case.
>
> Is there community convergence that Masakari is the solution to address VMs high availability?
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam P <sam47priya at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, 1 September 2017 at 19:27
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][masakari] new project teams application for       Masakari
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     I have just proposed inclusion of Masakari[1] (Instances High Availability
>     Service) into list of official OpenStack projects in [2]. Regarding this
>     proposal, I would like to ask OpenStack community for what else can be improved
>     in the project to meet all the necessary requirements.
>
>     And I would like use this thread to extend the discussion about project
>     masakari. It would be great if you can post your comments/questions in [2] or in
>     this thread. I would be happy to discuss and answer to your questions.
>
>     I will be at PTG in Denver from 9/12 (Tuesday) to 9/14(Thursday). Other Masakari
>     team members also will be there at PTG. We are happy to discuss anything
>     regarding to Masakari in PTG.
>     Please contact us via freenode IRC @ #openstack-masakari, or openstack-dev ML
>     with prefix [masakari].
>
>     Thank you.
>
>     [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Masakari
>     [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500118/
>
>     --- Regards,
>     Sampath
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev