Open Stack

Sounds interesting!  I'd be *very* interested to see *any* work that's been
done to make use of SPDK functionality for faster or more efficient HTTP ->
rotational media storage.  Couple of thoughts...

1) I think the memcache or redis API would be a better target for SPDK
research than Swift's HTTP blobstore API  - if you're just going for a pure
generic kv interface to a abstract/SSD/NVMe/XPoint storage backend [1]

2) if you wanna see how you might store Swift objects in a generic k/v
store you might consider earlier work to support k/v drives [2]

Good luck, I'm excited to see how you might try to apply SPDK to OpenStack
Swift!

Say Hi to Paul!

-Clay

1. the account/container layer of the Swift API in particular leverages a
lot of query like functionality and i'm not aware of any successful attempt
at API parity on a pure k/v store abstraction.
2. https://github.com/swiftstack/kinetic-swift

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, We We <simple_hlw at 163.com> wrote:

> Hi, all
>
> I am a newcomer in Swift, I have proposed a proposal for k-v store  in the
> SPDK community. The  proposal has submitted on
> https://trello.com/b/P5xBO7UR/things-to-do, please spare some time to
> visit it. In this proposal, we would like to  uses Swift as a target system
> to support k-v store. Could you please share with me if you have any ideas
> about it. I'd love to hear from your professional thoughts.
>
> Thx，
>
> Helloway
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171016/3be93be0/attachment.html>