Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed! On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist <jrist at redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we > > believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best > > candidate for a promotion. > > So we pinned it in our promotion pipeline and insisted on it for some > > hours. It has passed all the tests twice, so we dacided to promote. > > You will see the promotion date set to today, but the hash > > > > 3b718f3fecc866332ec0663fa77e758f8346ab93_4204ba89 > > > > is actually from Tuesday. > > > > Thanks. > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > Woot! Thanks! > > -J > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171105/53cb82d9/attachment.html>