[openstack-dev] [tc] Active or passive role with our database layer
zbitter at redhat.com
Tue May 23 21:18:50 UTC 2017
On 21/05/17 15:38, Monty Taylor wrote:
> One might argue that HA strategies are an operator concern, but in
> reality the set of workable HA strategies is tightly constrained by how
> the application works, and the pairing an application expecting one HA
> strategy with a deployment implementing a different one can have
> negative results ranging from unexpected downtime to data corruption.
This is your periodic reminder that we have ~50 applications sharing the
same database and not only do none of them know how the deployer will
configure the database, most will not even have an idea which set of
assumptions the other ~49 are making about how the deployer will
configure the database.
(Ditto for RabbitMQ.)
More information about the OpenStack-dev