[openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned
lbragstad at gmail.com
Fri May 19 20:43:47 UTC 2017
Attendees: 12 - 15
We conflicted with one of the Baremetal/VM sessions
I attempted to document most of the session in my recap .
We started out by doing a round-the-room of introductions so that folks
could put IRC nicks to faces (we also didn't have a packed room so this
went pretty quick). After that we cruised through a summary of keystone,
the format of the projects, and the various processes we use. All of this
took *maybe* 30 minutes.
>From there we had an open discussion and things evolved organically. We
ended up going through:
- the differences between the v2.0 and v3 APIs
- keystonemiddleware architecture, how it aids services, and how it
interacts with keystone
- we essentially followed an API call for creating a instance from
keystone -> nova -> glance
- how authentication scoping works and why it works that way
- how federation works and why it's setup the way it is
- how federated authentication works (https://goo.gl/NfY3mr)
All of this was pretty well-received and generated a lot of productive
discussion. We also had several seasoned keystone contributors in the room,
which helped a lot. Most of the attendees were all curious about similar
topics, which was great, but we totally could have split into separate
groups given the experience we had in the room (we'll save that in our back
pocket for next time).
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Michał Jastrzębski <inc007 at gmail.com>
> Attendees - full room (20-30?)
> Notes - Conflict with kolla-k8s demo probably didn't help
> While we didn't have etherpad, slides, recording (and video dongle
> that could fit my laptop), we had great session with analog tools
> (whiteboard and my voice chords). We walked through architecture of
> each Kolla project, how they relate to each other and so on.
> Couple things to take out from our onboarding:
> 1. Bring dongles
> 2. We could've used bigger room - people were leaving because we had
> no chairs left
> 3. Recording would be awesome
> 4. Low tech is not a bad tech
> All and all, when we started session I didn't know what to expect or
> what people will expect so we just...rolled with it, and people seemed
> to be happy with it:) I think onboarding rooms were great idea (kudos
> to whoever came up with it)! I'll be happy to run it again in Sydney.
> On 19 May 2017 at 08:12, Julien Danjou <julien at danjou.info> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19 2017, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> If you ran a room, please post the project, what you did in the room,
> >> what you think worked, what you would have done differently. If you
> >> attended a room you didn't run, please provide feedback about which one
> >> it was, and what you thought worked / didn't work from the other side of
> >> the table.
> > We shared a room for Telemetry and CloudKitty for 90 minutes.
> > I was there with Gordon Chung for Telemetry.
> > Christophe Sauthier was there for CloudKitty.
> > We only had 3 people showing up in the session. One wanted to read his
> > emails in a quiet room, the two others had a couple of question on
> > Telemetry – though it was not really related to contribution as far as I
> > can recall.
> > I had to leave after 45 minutes because they was an overlap with a talk
> > I was doing and rescheduling did not seem possible. And everybody left a
> > few minutes after I left apparently.
> > --
> > Julien Danjou
> > -- Free Software hacker
> > -- https://julien.danjou.info
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev