[openstack-dev] [tc][all] Do we need a #openstack-tc IRC channel
davanum at gmail.com
Wed May 17 11:36:06 UTC 2017
+1 to "my preference is to just start with the -dev channel"
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:23 AM, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com> wrote:
> On 16 May 2017 at 16:08, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2017-05-16 10:49:54 -0400:
>>> On 05/16/2017 09:38 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> > Folks,
>>> > See $TITLE :)
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Dims
>>> I'd rather avoid #openstack-tc and just use #openstack-dev.
>>> #openstack-dev is pretty low used environment (compared to like
>>> #openstack-infra or #openstack-nova). I've personally been trying to
>>> make it my go to way to hit up members of other teams whenever instead
>>> of diving into project specific channels, because typically it means we
>>> can get a broader conversation around the item in question.
>>> Our fragmentation of shared understanding on many issues is definitely
>>> exacerbated by many project channels, and the assumption that people
>>> need to watch 20+ different channels, with different context, to stay up
>>> on things.
>>> I would love us to have the problem that too many interesting topics are
>>> being discussed in #openstack-dev that we feel the need to parallelize
>>> them with a different channel. But I would say we should wait until
>>> that's actually a problem.
>> +1, let's start with just the -dev channel and see if volume becomes
>> an issue.
> +1 my preference is to just start with the -dev channel, and see how we go.
> +1 all the comments about the history and the discussion needing to be
> summarised via ML/gerrit anyway. We can link to the logs of the -dev
> channel for the "raw" discussion.
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
More information about the OpenStack-dev