[openstack-dev] [infra][all] etcd tarballs for CI use
davanum at gmail.com
Tue May 16 10:25:59 UTC 2017
Great question :) We need the version that has the grpc gateway v3alpha API:
Since we want to standardize on the etcd v3 API (to avoid migration of
data from /v2 to /v3). Unfortunately the v3 API is gRPC based and has
trouble with eventlet based processes. So we need the /v3alpha HTTP
API. You can see the prior discussion and list of bugs from Jay in
the etcd in xenial is 2.x which does not have either the gRPC v3 or
the gRPC+gateway HTTP API.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Jesse Pretorius
<Jesse.Pretorius at rackspace.co.uk> wrote:
> On 5/15/17, 11:20 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum at gmail.com> wrote:
>> At this moment, though Fedora has 3.1.7 , Xenial is way too old, So
>> we will need to pull down tar balls from either  or . proposing
>> backports is a possibility, but then we need some flexibility if we
>> end up picking up some specific version (say 3.0.17 vs 3.1.7). So a
>> download location would be good to have so we can request infra to
>> push versions we can experiment with.
> Hi Dims,
> I can’t help but ask - how old is too old? By what measure are we saying
> something is too old?
> I think we need to be careful with what we do here and ensure that the
> Distribution partners we have are on board with the criteria and whether
> They’re ready to include more recent package versions in their extra
> Archives (eg: RDO / UCA).
> As developers we want the most recent things because reasons… but
> Distributions and Operators are then stuck with raised complexity in
> their release and quality management processes.
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
More information about the OpenStack-dev