Open Stack

On 2017-05-03 14:04:40 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2017-05-03 13:23:11 -0400:
> > On 05/03/2017 01:02 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-03 18:16:29 +0200:
[...]
> > > Knowing what will be discussed in advanced also helps everyone
> > > collect their thoughts and be ready to contribute.
> > 
> > What about ensuring that every agenda topic is more than a line,
> > but includes a full paragraph about what the agenda topic
> > proposer expects it will cover. A lot of times the agenda items
> > are cryptic enough unless you are knee deep in things.
> > 
> > That would help people collect their thoughts even more and
> > break away from the few minutes of delay in introducing the
> > subject (the introduction of the subject would be in the
> > agenda).
> 
> If the goal is to move most of the discussion onto the mailing
> list, we could link to the thread(s) there, too.

This seems like a great idea to me. Granted in many cases we already
have a change proposed in Gerrit containing a (potentially) lengthy
explanation, but duplicating some of that on the agenda can't hurt.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170503/83f9a941/attachment.sig>