[openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] initial discussion for a new periodic pipeline

Sagi Shnaidman sshnaidm at redhat.com
Mon Mar 13 19:29:22 UTC 2017

Hi, all

I submitted a change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443964/
but seems like it reached a point which requires an additional discussion.

I had a few proposals, it's increasing period to 12 hours instead of 4 for
start, and to leave it in regular periodic *low* precedence.
I think we can start from 12 hours period to see how it goes, although I
don't think that 4 only jobs will increase load on OVB cloud, it's
completely negligible comparing to current OVB capacity and load.
But making its precedence as "low" IMHO completely removes any sense from
this pipeline to be, because we already run experimental-tripleo pipeline
which this priority and it could reach timeouts like 7-14 hours. So let's
assume we ran periodic job, it's queued to run now 12 + "low queue length"
- about 20 and more hours. It's even worse than usual periodic job and
definitely makes this change useless.
I'd like to notice as well that those periodic jobs unlike "usual" periodic
are used for repository promotion and their value are equal or higher than
check jobs, so it needs to run with "normal" or even "high" precedence.


On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>> On 2017-03-07 10:12:58 -0500 (-0500), Wesley Hayutin wrote:
>> > The TripleO team would like to initiate a conversation about the
>> > possibility of creating a new pipeline in Openstack Infra to allow
>> > a set of jobs to run periodically every four hours
>> [...]
>> The request doesn't strike me as contentious/controversial. Why not
>> just propose your addition to the zuul/layout.yaml file in the
>> openstack-infra/project-config repo and hash out any resulting
>> concerns via code review?
>> --
>> Jeremy Stanley
> Sounds good to me.
> We thought it would be nice to walk through it in an email first :)
> Thanks
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170313/2d15b2e5/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list