[openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

Steven Dake (stdake) stdake at cisco.com
Thu Mar 2 04:28:29 UTC 2017


A monthly meeting as I have voiced before in this thread is not sufficient to enable good cross-project collaboration.  To rectify this, when Steve Hardy started this thread, I started the process of creating an IRC channel in #openstack-deployment.

I understand there has been one voice on this thread that wants #openstack-dev to be used for that communication.  There have been several others that do want a specific IRC channel.  Generally, there is consensus to use the #openstack-deployment channel as that is the name of the tag used in the mailing list.

Anyone is welcome.  Hope to see folks there.


From: Andy McCrae <andy.mccrae at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 8:19 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 28 February 2017 at 08:25, Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com<mailto:flavio at redhat.com>> wrote:
On 28/02/17 08:01 +0000, Jesse Pretorius wrote:
On 2/28/17, 12:52 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" <inc007 at gmail.com<mailto:inc007 at gmail.com>> wrote:

   I think instead of adding yet-another-irc-channel how about create
   weekly meetings? We can rant in scheduled time and it probably will
   get more attention

Happy to meet, in fact I think it’ll be important for keeping things on track – however weekly is too often. I think once a month at most is perfectly fine.

Yes, monthly prolly better than weekly in this cas (if we ever decide to have these meetings).

Agreed - monthly sounds like a good start, we can always see how it goes and change up as required.
I think if the only change is that we have a WG added to the Wiki and a [deployments] tag added for the ML,
then we can't really expect to change much or have a large impact.

I'd love to see this build some momentum and come up with useful outcomes, which I think the PTG session
started really nicely. There are clearly quite a few common issues that we can address better as a collective.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170302/0bf5512f/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list