[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict
derekh at redhat.com
Thu Jul 13 08:51:31 UTC 2017
On 12 July 2017 at 22:23, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey folks,
> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
> would work with multinode jobs.
The idea was that we would create a libvirt domain on the overcloud
controller that Ironic could then control with VirtualBMC. But for the
moment the job only installs Ironic and I was going to build onto it
> Also, Flavio would like to test k8s on scenario006:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471759/ . To avoid having too much
> scenarios and complexity, I think if ironic tests can be done on a
> 2nodes job, then we can deploy ironic on scenario004 maybe. If not,
> then please give the requirements so we can see how to structure it.
I'll take look and see whats possible
> For Flavio's need, I think we need a dedicated scenario for now, since
> he's not going to deploy any OpenStack service on the overcloud for
> now, just k8s.
> Thanks for letting us know the plans, so we can keep the scenarios in
> good shape.
> Note: Numans also wants to test OVN and I suggested to create
> scenario007 (since we can't deploy OVN before Pike, so upgrades
> wouldn't work).
> Note2: it seems like efforts done to test complex HA architectures
> weren't finished in scenario005 - Michele: any thoughts on this one?
> should we remove it now or do we expect it working one day?
> Emilien Macchi
More information about the OpenStack-dev