[openstack-dev] [cinder] Can I use lvm thin provisioning in mitaka?

Marco Marino marino.mrc at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 17:29:01 UTC 2017


At the moment I have:
volume_clear=zero
volume_clear_size=30 <-- MBR will be deleted here!
with tick provisioning
I think this can be a good solution in my case. Let me know what do you
think about this.
Thank you
Marco



2017-01-23 17:21 GMT+01:00 Chris Friesen <chris.friesen at windriver.com>:

> On 01/21/2017 03:00 AM, Marco Marino wrote:
>
>> Really thank you!! It's difficult for me find help on cinder and I think
>> this is
>> the right place!
>> @Duncan, if my goal is to speeding up bootable volume creation, I can
>> avoid to
>> use thin provisioning. I can use image cache and in this way the
>> "retrieve from
>> glance" and the "qemu-img convert to RAW" parts will be skipped. Is this
>> correct? And whit this method I don't have a performancy penalty
>> mentioned by Chris.
>> @Chris: Yes, I'm using volume_clear option and volume deletion is very
>> fast
>>
>
> Just to be clear, you should not use "volume_clear=none" unless you are
> using thin provisioning or you do not care about security.
>
> If you have "volume_clear=none" with thick LVM, then newly created cinder
> volumes may contain data written to the disk via other cinder volumes that
> were later deleted.
>
>
> Chris
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170123/054fcf64/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list