Open Stack

On 10/01/17 07:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09 2017, William M Edmonds wrote:
>
>> I started the conversation on IRC [5], but wanted to send this to the
>> mailing list and see if others have thoughts/concerns here and figure out
>> what we should do about this going forward.
>
> Nothing? The code has not been removed, it has been moved to a new
> project. Ocata will be the second release for Panko, so if user did not
> switch already during Newton, they'll have to do it for Ocata. That's a
> lot of overlap. Two cycles to switch to a "new" service should be enough.

well it's not actually two. it'd just be the one cycle in Newton since 
it's gone in Ocata. :P

that said, for me, the move to remove it is to avoid any needless 
additional work of maintaining two active codebases. we're a small team 
so it's work we don't have time for.

as i mentioned in chat, i'm ok with reverting patch and leaving it for 
Ocata but if the transition is clean (similiar to how aodh was split) 
i'd rather not waste resources on maintaining residual 'dead' code.

cheers,
-- 
gord