[openstack-dev] [oslo] pbr and warnerrors status

Doug Hellmann doug at doughellmann.com
Fri Feb 24 14:50:10 UTC 2017


Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2017-02-08 10:15:57 -0600:
> 
> On 02/08/2017 09:41 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2017-02-08 09:20:31 -0600:
> >>
> >> On 02/08/2017 01:53 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >>> On 2017-02-08 00:56, Ian Cordasco  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 7, 2017 5:47 PM, "Joshua Harlow" <harlowja at fastmail.com
> >>>> <mailto:harlowja at fastmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>     Likely just never pulled the trigger.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Seems like we should pull it though.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Will have to wait until Pike given the library release freeze
> >>>
> >>> I've pushed a patch to release pbr so that we won't forget about it:
> >>>
> >>> https://review.openstack.org/430618
> >>>
> >>> Andreas
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great, thanks everybody!
> >>
> >
> > It would be useful for someone to look at the pbr change and verify that
> > releasing it as-is won't break the builds for a bunch of projects by
> > turning the flag back on. If it will, we're going to want to provide a
> > way to stage the roll out. If we change the name of the flag, for
> > example, we could release pbr for support for checking warnings, and
> > then projects could enable that when they have time and with the fixes
> > to the docs needed to make it work properly.
> 
> I think the only way to do this would be to run a docs build in every 
> project with warnerrors turned on, using the unreleased pbr.  Given the 
> amount of time it's been broken, there's a good chance some issues have 
> snuck in (they had in diskimage-builder).  So maybe deprecating the old 
> option name and requiring another explicit opt-in from everyone is the 
> safest way to go.
> 
> Thoughts on a new name?  fatalwarnings maybe?
> 

I've proposed [1] to rename the option.

Doug

[1] https://review.openstack.org/437929



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list