[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

Heidi Joy Tretheway heidijoy at openstack.org
Tue Feb 14 18:20:31 UTC 2017


Hi TripleO team, 

We can definitely find a middle ground here. Thanks so much for the feedback. I’ll send these examples on to the illustrators and I think we can make it work. I appreciate your willingness to compromise!

> On Feb 14, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez <ccamacho at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Heidi,
> 
> I think most of us already agreed on the fact that our current logo was created by developers and we like it.
> The idea should be to iterate over our current logo to make it fit the foundation guidelines.
> 
> I don't think is hard to do it, I can give you some examples (***The owl colors were randomly chosen).
> 
> https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_h.pdf <https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_h.pdf>
> https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_h.png <https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_h.png>
> https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_h.svg <https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_h.svg>
> https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_v.pdf <https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_v.pdf>
> https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_v.png <https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_v.png>
> https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_v.svg <https://cdn.rawgit.com/ccamacho/tripleo-graphics/5ed624b8/logos/openstack_tripleo_logo_v.svg>
> 
> Please just let me know if you need any further information/feedback/help.
> 
> Cheers,
> Carlos.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com <mailto:emilien at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Heidi,
> >
> > TripleO team discussed about the logo this morning during our weekly meeting.
> > We understood that we had to change our existing logo because it
> > doesn't meet OpenStack themes requirements, and that's fine.
> >
> > Though we would like you to re-iterate on a new logo that would be a
> > variation on the current logo that moves closer to the foundation.
> >
> > Our existing logo is: http://tripleo.org/_static/tripleo_owl.svg <http://tripleo.org/_static/tripleo_owl.svg>
> >
> > Please let us know if you can prepare a new logo close to this one,
> > and I think we would find a middle ground here.
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez
> > <ccamacho at redhat.com <mailto:ccamacho at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > > I'll vote also for option 1 if we can keep it.
> > >
> > > One thing, you can see how designers have iterated over ironic's logo
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170201/a016f685/attachment.png <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170201/a016f685/attachment.png>
> > > to fit the OpenStack illustration style.
> > >
> > > Is it possible for designers to iterate over
> > > http://tripleo.org/_static/tripleo_owl.svg <http://tripleo.org/_static/tripleo_owl.svg> to make it fit the guidelines?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Carlos.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
> > > <lucasagomes at gmail.com <mailto:lucasagomes at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Just a FYI, we have had similar discussions about the proposed logo for
> > >> Ironic, there's still many unanswered questions but, if you guys are
> > >> interested this is the link to the ML thread:
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/111401.html <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/111401.html>
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Lucas
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com <mailto:emilien at redhat.com>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Team, I've got this email from Heidi.
> > >>>
> > >>> I see 3 options :
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. Keep existing logo: http://tripleo.org/_static/tripleo_owl.svg <http://tripleo.org/_static/tripleo_owl.svg> .
> > >>>
> > >>> 2. Re-design a new logo that "meets" OpenStack "requirements".
> > >>>
> > >>> 3. Pick-up the one proposed (see below).
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Personally, I would vote for keeping our existing logo (1.) unless
> > >>> someone has time to create another one or if the team likes the proposed
> > >>> one.
> > >>>
> > >>> The reason why I want to keep our logo is because our current logo was
> > >>> created by TripleO devs, we like it and we already have tee-shirts and other
> > >>> goodies with it. I don't see any good reason to change it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Discussion is open and we'll vote as a team.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Emilien.
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>> From: Heidi Joy Tretheway <heidijoy at openstack.org <mailto:heidijoy at openstack.org>>
> > >>> Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:27 PM
> > >>> Subject: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?
> > >>> To: Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com <mailto:emilien at redhat.com>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Emilien,
> > >>>
> > >>> I’m following up on the much-debated TripleO logo. I’d like to help your
> > >>> team reach a solution that makes them happy but still fits within the family
> > >>> of logos we’re using at the PTG and going forward. Here’s what our
> > >>> illustrators came up with, which hides an “O” shape in the owl (face and
> > >>> wing arcs).
> > >>>
> > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qz45miiiam3caiy/AAAzPGYEZRMGH6Otid3bLfHFa?dl=0 <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qz45miiiam3caiy/AAAzPGYEZRMGH6Otid3bLfHFa?dl=0>
> > >>> At this point, I don’t have quorum from your team (I got a lot of
> > >>> conflicting feedback, most of which was “don’t like” but not actionable for
> > >>> the illustrators to make a revision). At the PTG, we’ll have mascot stickers
> > >>> and signage for all teams except for Ironic and TripleO, since we’re still
> > >>> waiting on your teams to make a final decision.
> > >>>
> > >>> May I recommend that your team choose one person (or a small group of no
> > >>> more than three) to finalize this? I was able to work through all of Swift’s
> > >>> issues with just a quick 15-minute chat with John Dickinson and I’d like to
> > >>> believe we can solve this for TripleO as well.
> > >>>
> > >>> We know some of your team has expressed concern over retiring the
> > >>> existing mascot. It’s not our intention to make anyone “get rid of” a
> > >>> beloved icon. Your team can certainly print it on vintage items like shirts
> > >>> and stickers. But for official channels like the website, we need a logo to
> > >>> represent TripleO that’s cohesive with the rest of the set.
> > >>>
> > >>> Perhaps when you’re face to face with your team at the PTG, you can
> > >>> discuss and hopefully render a final decision to either accept this as a
> > >>> logo, or determine a few people willing to make any final changes with me?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks in advance for your help!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Heidi Joy Tretheway
> > >>> Senior Marketing Manager, OpenStack Foundation
> > >>> 503 816 9769 | Skype: heidi.tretheway
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Emilien Macchi
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> __________________________________________________________________________
> > >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >>> Unsubscribe:
> > >>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> __________________________________________________________________________
> > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> > >>
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________________________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Emilien Macchi
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170214/5dc92ad0/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list