[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky
aschultz at redhat.com
Wed Dec 13 22:01:41 UTC 2017
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>> So I went through the list of blueprints and moved some that were
>> either not updated or appeared to have a bunch of patches not in a
>> mergable state.
>> Please take some time to review the list of blueprints currently
>> associated with Rocky to see if your efforts have been moved. If
>> you believe you're close to implementing the feature in the next week
>> or two, let me know and we can move it back into Queens. If you think
>> it will take an extended period of time (more than 2 weeks) to land
>> but we need it in Queens, please submit an FFE.
> I'd like to get the ball rolling on applying for an FFE for:
> So how do I do that thing? For requirements it's just a thread on the
> mailing list is there soemthing more formal for tripleo?
I just need an understanding on the impact and the timeline. Replying
here is sufficient.
I assume since some of this work was sort of done earlier outside of
tripleo and does not affect the default installation path that most
folks will consume, it shouldn't be impacting to general testing or
increase regressions. My general requirement for anyone who needed an
FFE for functionality that isn't essential is that it's off by
default, has minimal impact to the existing functionality and we have
a rough estimate on feature landing. Do you have idea when you expect
to land this functionality? Additionally the patches seem to be
primarily around the ironic integration so have those been sorted out?
> Yours Tony.
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev