[openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query

Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) gergely.csatari at nokia.com
Mon Dec 11 17:41:51 UTC 2017

Hi Jay, 

Okay. Thanks for the clarification. Makes sense. 

Maybe the best would be to have a privilege level what covers the needs of MANO/NFVO, but still not full admin privileges. Do you think is this possible?


-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 4:41 PM
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][gap-04][blazar]: Clarification on the scope of the capacity query

On 12/11/2017 07:24 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote:
> Hi Masahito,
> Thanks for the answer.
> Some clarification questions. You mention that the NFVO works as both an user and an admin for the cloud. Is this becouse the resource usage per user info is more for cloud operators while the resource usage per tenant / per resource provider is more for cloud users?
> The solution you described is valid for the capacity per tenant case if I understand right. Is this correct?

I think he is more referring to the fact that the MANO/NFVO service user must have administrative privileges in order to, for example, spawn new instances in multiple projects/tenants and communicate with the control plane to do things like adjust quotas, etc.


OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list